Natalie C Newman, PA
Locations of Natalie C Newman, PA
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple
2401 S 31st St , Temple, TX, 76508
6653.5mi
Directions
Call
254.724.2111
Hours of Operation
Hours
Lab Hours
Hours of Operation
Office Hours
Biography
| Language(s) Spoken |
|---|
| English |
| Education |
|---|
| Education: MPAS, University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals (Galveston) (2003) |
| Certifications |
|---|
| Physician Assistant- National Comm on Certif of Physician Assistants |
| Hospital Affiliations |
|---|
| Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple |
Insurances accepted
Baylor Scott & White has established agreements with several types of insurance to ensure your health needs are covered.
Insurance listings are subject to change without prior notice.
Please call your physician's office or your health or insurance plan to verify coverage information prior to scheduling your visit or procedure. Not all members participating in contracted networks have "in network" access. In network participation may change from time to time without prior notice. Independent providers (which could include, for example only, anesthesiologists, radiologists, pathologists, emergency medicine physicians, advance practice professionals, and other independent providers of health care services) may deliver part of your care, and such providers may be considered out-of-network on your health and insurance plans even if the Facility may be considered in network. If you desire additional information as to the providers who may be involved in providing your care, you can either ask your treating provider (who may know some of the specialists or groups who could be involved) or you can request a list of Facility-based physician groups by calling the following toll free number: (877) 810-0372. This list is updated annually and is subject to change without prior notice.
Please contact your provider to confirm if your insurance is accepted.
Let’s tailor your healthcare to you.
Use MyBSWHealth to get a personalized care experience.
Patient Ratings (665)
The patient rating score is an average of all responses to physician-related questions on our nationally recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey .
| averageRating | metric | |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | Time Care Provider spent with Patient | |
| 4.7 | Provider included you in decisions | |
| 4.7 | Provider showed concern | |
| 4.8 | Friendliness/Courtesy of Care Provider | |
| 4.7 | Rate Care Provider |
Patient Comments (211)
Overview of patient comments
Summary created using AI
Patient comments are gathered from our Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey and are displayed in their entirety. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.
Patients appreciate
Natalie Newman receives consistently high praise from patients for her exceptional listening skills and attentiveness. Reviewers repeatedly emphasize that she takes time to truly understand their concerns, asks pertinent and thorough questions, and doesn't rush through appointments. Patients appreciate her professional yet warm demeanor, describing her as kind, caring, compassionate, and friendly. Her clinical competence is frequently highlighted, with patients noting her knowledge, ability to arrive at accurate diagnoses quickly, thoroughness in reviewing medical histories, and careful attention to medication interactions. Many reviews commend her clear communication style, efficiency in prescribing appropriate treatments, and her ability to make patients feel comfortable and heard during their visits.
Patients also share
While the overwhelming majority of reviews are positive, a small number of patients identified areas for potential improvement. One patient noted that Natalie has an "exceptionally dry and neutral personality," suggesting that while clinically competent, her interpersonal style could be warmer. Another reviewer mentioned feeling "very rushed" during their appointment, though they still received the help they needed. One patient expressed mild disappointment about not receiving an antibiotic for a sinus infection, though they acknowledged understanding the clinical reasoning behind the decision. These concerns represent a very small fraction of the overall feedback.