Locations of Sarah Lyn Starling, FNP

Biography

Language(s) Spoken
English
Education
Education: MSN, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (School of Allied Health Sciences) (2017)
Certifications
Family Nurse Practitioner- American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANPCB)
Hospital Affiliations
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple

Insurances accepted

Baylor Scott & White has established agreements with several types of insurance to ensure your health needs are covered.

Insurance listings are subject to change without prior notice.

 

Please contact your provider to confirm if your insurance is accepted.

Let’s tailor your healthcare to you.

Use MyBSWHealth to get a personalized care experience.

Create a MyBSWHealth account

Patient Ratings (34)

The patient rating score is an average of all responses to physician-related questions on our nationally recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey .

4.7 overall patient satisfaction
averageRating metric
4.9
Friendliness/Courtesy of Care Provider
4.7
Provider showed concern
4.7
Provider included you in decisions
4.7
Time Care Provider spent with Patient
4.7
Wait Time at Clinic
4.8
Rate Care Provider

Patient Comments (22)

Overview of patient comments

Summary created using AI

Patients appreciate

Sarah Starling, FNP receives consistently high praise from patients across multiple dimensions of care. The most frequently mentioned strengths include her professionalism, which appears in nearly half of the reviews, and her warm, personable demeanor that makes patients feel comfortable and at ease. Patients particularly appreciate that she is friendly, easy to talk with, and takes time with them without making visits feel rushed. Her knowledge and thoroughness are also noted positively, along with her respectful and kind approach to patient care. Several reviews highlight her efficiency and ability to address patient needs in a timely manner.

Patients also share

The reviews reveal minimal areas for improvement, with only two reviews expressing less than full satisfaction. One patient rated their experience 3.6 stars with the brief comment that the "provider was ok," though no specific concerns were detailed. Another review simply stated "Good" with a 4.17-star rating. These limited critiques do not identify any recurring patterns or specific issues that need addressing, suggesting isolated experiences rather than systemic problems.

Patient comments are gathered from our Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey and are displayed in their entirety. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.