Locations of Sarah Lyn Starling, FNP

Biography

Language(s) Spoken
English
Education
Education: MSN, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (School of Allied Health Sciences) (2017)
Certifications
Family Nurse Practitioner- American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANPCB)
Hospital Affiliations
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple

Insurances accepted

Baylor Scott & White has established agreements with several types of insurance to ensure your health needs are covered.

Insurance listings are subject to change without prior notice.

 

Please contact your provider to confirm if your insurance is accepted.

Let’s tailor your healthcare to you.

Use MyBSWHealth to get a personalized care experience.

Create a MyBSWHealth account

Patient Ratings (34)

The patient rating score is an average of all responses to physician-related questions on our nationally recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey .

4.7 overall patient satisfaction
averageRating metric
4.9
Friendliness/Courtesy of Care Provider
4.7
Provider showed concern
4.7
Provider included you in decisions
4.7
Time Care Provider spent with Patient
4.7
Wait Time at Clinic
4.8
Rate Care Provider

Patient Comments (20)

Overview of patient comments

Summary created using AI

Patients appreciate

Sarah Starling, FNP receives consistently high praise from patients across multiple dimensions of care. The most frequently mentioned strengths include her professionalism, which appears in nearly every review, and her personable, friendly demeanor that makes patients feel comfortable and at ease. Patients particularly appreciate that she takes time with them without making visits feel rushed, is easy to talk to about medical concerns, and demonstrates genuine concern for their health. Her knowledge and thoroughness are also regularly highlighted, along with her efficiency in providing timely care. Many patients specifically note the combination of her professional competence with her warm, approachable personality.

Patients also share

The reviews reveal minimal areas for improvement, with the vast majority being highly positive. Two reviews stand out as less enthusiastic: one 3.6-star review simply stating "Provider was ok" without elaboration, and one 4.17-star review offering only "Good" as feedback. These reviews do not provide specific constructive criticism or identify particular issues that need addressing. The lack of detailed negative feedback or recurring complaints suggests that opportunities for improvement are limited, though the brief nature of these lower-rated reviews prevents identification of specific concerns.

Patient comments are gathered from our Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey and are displayed in their entirety. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.